Skip to main content
· 3/10/2014

Diamond v. Richmond

Citations

  • 179 Wash. App. 1050

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “[d]espite the fact that MHPA matters frequently appear moot due to the lapse -7- J-S46044-23 of time between an involuntary commitment and appellate disposition, our courts consistently have held that a live controversy exists in these cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lau, Leach, Schindler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.