Skip to main content
· 10/19/1965

Diamond Tool Research Company, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 55 Cust. Ct. 465
  • 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting term “affecting commerce” found in 29 U.S.C. § 152(7) broadly to include Congress’s full powers under Commerce Clause
  • indicating the NLRB could apply the de minimis maxim in accordance with congressional intent even where the language of the National Labor Relations Act is absolute
  • indicating the NLRB could apply the de minimis maxim in accordance with congressional intent even where the language of the National Labor Relations Act is absolute
  • upholding Congress’ authority to enforce the NLRA against a small garment business
  • \The power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce is plenary and extends to all such commerce be it great or small.\
  • “The power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce is plenary and extends to all such commerce be it great or small.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Consisting, Donlon, Ford, Richardson, Third, Were

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.