Skip to main content
· 6/19/1984

Diamond Supply Co. v. Prudential Paper Products Co.

Citations

  • 589 F. Supp. 470
  • 223 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 869
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that goods sold by the defendant were genuine goods of the plaintiff in part because the defendant still had the ability to guarantee the quality of its products
  • paper products were produced under contract and “identical or qualitatively equivalent” so no infringement.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kevin Thomas Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.