· 6/19/1984
Diamond Supply Co. v. Prudential Paper Products Co.
Citations
- 589 F. Supp. 470
- 223 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 869
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15786
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that goods sold by the defendant were genuine goods of the plaintiff in part because the defendant still had the ability to guarantee the quality of its products
- paper products were produced under contract and “identical or qualitatively equivalent” so no infringement.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kevin Thomas Duffy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.