Skip to main content
· 3/15/1976

Federal Case

Citations

  • 528 F.2d 645
  • 1976 CCH OSHD 20,521
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “statutes and regulations which allow monetary penalties against those who violate them” must “give an employer fair warning of the conduct [they] prohibi[t] or requir[e]”
  • explaining that “statutes and regulations which allow monetary penalties against those who violate them” must “give an employer fair warning of the conduct [they] prohibi[t] or requir[e]”
  • improper “[t]o strain the plain and natural meaning of words for the purpose of alleviating a perceived safety hazard”
  • “[S]tatutes and regulations which allow monetary penalties against those who violate them ... must give an employer fair warning of the conduct [they] prohibit[] or require[].”
  • “If a violation of a regulation subjects private parties to criminal or civil sanctions, a regulation cannot be construed to mean what an agency intended but did not adequately express”
  • “If a violation of a regulation subjects private parties to criminal or civil sanctions, a regulation cannot be construed to mean what an agency intended but did not adequately express”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.