Diamond Mills Paper Co. v. Leonard Hygiene Ice Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the applicability of section 523 is limited “to individual debtors”
• discussing U.S. ex rel. Fullington v. Parkway Hosp., Inc., 351 B.R. 280, 290 (E.D.N.Y. 2006)
• “[A]djacent statutory subsections that refer to the same subject matter should be read harmoniously.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• relators seeking 14 to except an unliquidated debt from discharge, 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d)(6), 15 had Article III standing
• “Punctuation in a legal text will rarely change the meaning of a word, but it will often determine whether a modifying phrase or clause applies to all that preceded it or only to a part.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).