Diamond Electric Inc. v. Pace Pacific Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff had not met burden after considering evidence at trial, “including the testimony of witnesses, the exhibits offered at trial, the various papers submitted by the parties, and the stipulations of the parties”
• declining to find that projections prepared in anticipation of a merger showed intent of actual fraud, even where it could be shown that some defen dants believed that the projections were overly optimistic

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).