Dialysis Access Center, LLC v. RMS Lifeline, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \any dispute\ within agreement at issue was sufficiently broad in scope to include party's fraudulent inducement claim
• noting that voidability is a matter of validity
• assuming arguendo that the arbitration clause established a condition precedent to arbitration, even though it was disputed between the parties, and holding that the arbitrator must decide whether the parties complied with such a procedural pre-requisite to arbitration
• assuming arguendo that the arbitration clause established a condition precedent to arbitration, even though it was disputed between the parties, and holding that the arbitrator must decide whether the parties complied with such a procedural pre-requisite to arbitration
• agreement to arbitrate “any dispute that may arise under” contract applied to claim of fraud in performance of contract
• “[D]ue regard must be given to the federal policy favoring arbitration, and ambiguities as to the scope of the arbitration clause itself resolved in favor of arbitration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).