Skip to main content
· 3/3/1992

D.I.A.L., Inc. v. New Jersey Department of Community Affairs

Citations

  • 254 N.J. Super. 426
  • 603 A.2d 967
  • 1992 N.J. Super. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence not wholly circumstantial when it included appellant’s confession to former cellmate
  • “[W]e have explained that it is imperative that the trial court enter findings of fact and conclusions of law consistent with Barker” because, “[a]bsent such findings, there is no exercise of discretion for this Court to review.” (citations and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Havey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.