· 3/3/1992
D.I.A.L., Inc. v. New Jersey Department of Community Affairs
Citations
- 254 N.J. Super. 426
- 603 A.2d 967
- 1992 N.J. Super. LEXIS 75
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence not wholly circumstantial when it included appellant’s confession to former cellmate
- “[W]e have explained that it is imperative that the trial court enter findings of fact and conclusions of law consistent with Barker” because, “[a]bsent such findings, there is no exercise of discretion for this Court to review.” (citations and punctuation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Havey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.