Diaco v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[t]he failure of a defendant to raise res judicata in answer does not deprive a court of the power to dismiss a claim on that ground\
• noting that \wholly conclusory and inconsistent allegations\ do not suffice to state a claim
• affirming the dismissal of a claim based on “wholly conclusory and inconsistent allegations”
• “The failure of a defendant to raise res judicatain [an] answer does not deprive a court of the power to dismiss a claim on that ground.”
• “The failure of a defendant to raise res judicata in[an] answer does not deprive a court of the power to dismiss a claim on that ground.”
• “The failure of a defendant to raise res judicata in [an] answer does not deprive a court of the power to dismiss a claim on that ground.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).