Di Santo v. City of Warrenville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that water users’ suit to rescind city contract was barred by laches where suit was filed two years after the contract and one year after bonds were transferred to a trust and shares in the trust were sold to the public
• plaintiffs were deemed to be aware of city’s purchase of water works and sewer system as a matter of public record
• even though mandamus is an action at law and not an action in equity, laches is available as a defense
• even though mandamus is an action at law and not an action in equity, laches is available as a defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).