Di Salvo v. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF GR. KANSAS CITY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• back pay period did not terminate when plaintiff moved outside geographical area, because move would not have occurred absent discrimination
• stating that jobs are substantially equal if they require the same effort, skill and responsibility .... That plaintiffs male successor, who performed the same duties, was paid a higher salary than plaintiff is sufficient to prove discrimination in compensation because of sex.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).