Di Lisio v. Vidal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a motion to compel in part because the requesting party had access to the storage facility containing the allegedly responsive documents
• “A number of district courts have recognized the unique burden 9 of producing documents stored on backup tapes and, by invoking Rule 26(c
• documents placed in storage facility by bankruptcy trustee were kept in the usual course of business as the boxes of documents were neatly stacked and clearly labeled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).