Di Giuseppe v. Di Giuseppe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “in the Fourth Circuit, alleged constructive amendments not objected to below are subject to plain error review”
• holding that “in the Fourth Circuit, alleged constructive amendments not objected to below are subject to plain error review”
• holding that “in the Fourth Circuit, alleged constructive amendments not objected to below are subject to plain error review”
• stating that a Panel of this Court may depart from a prior Panel decision that is inconsistent with a Supreme Court decision
• explaining that we are not bound by prior panel decisions that “subsequently prove[] untenable,” and that a decision “is untenable if its reasoning or holding is inconsistent with a Supreme Court decision”
• “Authority is untenable if its reasoning or holding is inconsistent with a Supreme Court decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).