Skip to main content
· 9/9/2010

DHP Holdings II Corp. v. Home Depot, Inc. (In Re DHP Holdings II Corp.)

Citations

  • 435 B.R. 264
  • 2010 WL 3581879

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that when no proof of claim was filed, a dispute over a pre-petition contract was merely a breach of contract claim and, therefore, a non-core proceeding
  • stating that a court has jurisdiction over motions to transfer venue, which are core proceedings
  • upholding a forum selection clause because it is a manifestation of the parties’ preferences as to a convenient forum
  • upholding a forum selection clause because it is a manifestation of the parties’ preferences as to a convenient forum
  • “In this case the location of the books and records is not a significant factor due to the ease of transporting documents.”
  • “Courts are more likely to enforce a forum selection clause in a non-core matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary F. Walrath

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.