DGR Associates, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a challenge to a solicitation term, in a post-award bid protest filed in our court, was preserved by the filing of a formal, agency-level protest before the proposal submission deadline
• recognizing that a challenge to a solicitation term, in a post-award bid protest filed in the Court of Federal Claims, was preserved by the filing of a formal, agency-level protest before the proposal submission deadline
• noting that a protestor should not \blindside\ a procuring agency with its bid protest complaint
• concluding the government’s position was justified where there were differing interpretations among the three branches of government as to statute’s meaning
• noting that “neither” the GAO nor the United States Court of Federal Claims “has the authority to invalidate properly promulgated regulations of an Executive Branch agency”
• discussing whether the government’s Blue & Gold Fleet jurisdictional argument was substantially justified and holding that it was

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).