D.F. And D.F., on Behalf of N.F. v. Ramapo Central School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for the district court to consider the issue in the first instance
• “[F]or an IEP to be reasonably 28 calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefits, it must be likely to produce 1 progress, not regression.” (citation omitted)
• “This court ... has not established whether, and to what extent, retrospective evidence of a student’s progress — or the lack thereof — should be considered in determining the validity of an IEP in which the student is currently enrolled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).