Dezso Benedek v. the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cautioning that trial court’s analysis when considering a motion under OCGA § 9-11-21 should not be “based upon a consideration of the merits of the claim against [those] parties”
• “[A] pending dispositive motion will not preclude a party from amending his or her pleading.”
• “When a party wishes to add or drop a party by amendment, OCGA § 9-11-15 (a) must be read in pari materia with OCGA § 9-11-21, which allows the dropping and adding of parties only by order of the court on motion of any party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).