DEYSI SOLORIO SANTOYO v. FRANCISCO ANTONIO RAMOS MEDRANO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “images were viewed by the jury which was in a position to draw its own independent conclusion as to whether real children were depicted.”
• holding that the “images were viewed by the jury which was in a position to draw its own independent conclusion as to whether real children were depicted”
• holding that it was unnecessary for the government, as a part of its affirmative case, to negate what is merely unsupported speculation that the pictures showed virtual children as opposed to real ones
• holding that individual files are “other matter”
• holding that individual files are \other matter\
• rejecting argument that technology was available to produce pornographic images without using real children; government was not required to negate what is merely unsupported speculation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).