Deyarina Vergara v. Raul Angula Martinez D/B/A Nightstar Transporation, John Erringhouse, and Lyft, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the verbatim adoption of findings suggested by a party is not automatically objectionable, so long as those findings are - 14 - supported by the record
• noting the court preferred findings “drawn with the insight of a disinterested mind” rather than counsel’s proposed findings adopted verbatim by the trial court
• expressing disapproval of the 'mechanical' adoption of findings of fact prepared by a party, but stating that such findings are formally those of the trial judge and 'are not to be rejected out-of-hand'
• ex-pressing disapproval of the “mechanical” adoption of findings of fact prepared by a party but stating that such findings are formally those of the trial judge and “are not to be rejected out>-of-hand”
• expressing disapproval of the 'mechanical' adoption of findings of fact prepared by a party, but stating that such findings are formally those of the trial judge and 'are not to be rejected out- of-hand'
• verbatim findings are not to be summarily rejected and will stand if supported by the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).