Dey v. Milwaukee Forge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The undisputed facts establish that following the plaintiffs surgery in October 1991, the defendant allowed the plaintiff to return to work halftime, working four hours per day in a light duty position”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).