DEXTER OLIVIER v. SARA OLIVIER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court may consider “charged, uncharged, dismissed, and acquitted conduct as relevant conduct” if the district court’s factual findings are “supported by a preponderance of the evidence” (quoting United States v. Thomas, 760 F.3d 879, 889 (8th Cir. 2014))
• explaining sentencing courts may rely on relevant uncharged conduct “supported by a preponderance of the evidence”
• district court may consider any relevant information that may assist the court in determining a fair and just sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).