DeWitt v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the invalid exclusion was clear and unambiguous and therefore afforded no coverage in excess of the required minimum
• holding automobile business exclusion contrary to compulsory insurance laws and therefore unenforceable
• holding automobile business exclusion contrary to compulsory insurance laws and, therefore, unenforceable
• adhering to general rule to find household exclusion void only as to the minimum coverage required by statute
• declaring household exclusion clause void to the extent of statutory minimum coverage
• “We do, however, caution that the limited application of such exclusions should be clearly and specifically set forth in the policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).