Dewey v. Redevelopment Agency of Reno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “back-to-back briefings” by members of a government agency did not “create[] a constructive quorum or serial communication in violation of” Nevada’s open meeting law
• holding that “back-to-back briefings” by members of a government agency did not “create[ ] a constructive quorum or serial communication in violation of’ Nevada’s open meeting law
• holding that “back-to-back briefings” by members of a government agency did not “create[] a constructive quorum or serial communication in violation of” Nevada’s open meeting law
• rejecting the argument that back-to-back briefings constituted a “constructive quorum” and holding when less than a quorum is present, private discussions and information gathering do not violate the Open Meeting Law
• noting that conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
• The Nevada Supreme Court declined to find that “back-to-back briefings” of the members of the City of Reno’s Redevelopment Agency “created a constructive quorum or serial communication in violation of’ Nevada’s Open Meeting Law.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).