Skip to main content
· 3/22/1932

Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. Crooks

Citations

  • 57 F.2d 499
  • 10 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1566
  • 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4009
  • 1932 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9178
  • 10 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the statutes gov- erning LUBA’s review lend “particular force” to our require- ment that error claimed on review to us is preserved before LUBA
  • preservation requirement applies to review of LUBA orders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Booth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.