· 3/22/1932
Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. Crooks
Citations
- 57 F.2d 499
- 10 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1566
- 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4009
- 1932 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9178
- 10 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the statutes gov- erning LUBA’s review lend “particular force” to our require- ment that error claimed on review to us is preserved before LUBA
- preservation requirement applies to review of LUBA orders
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Booth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.