Indiana Court of Appeals· 12/31/2008
Dewald v. State
Citations
- 898 N.E.2d 488
- 2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 2621
- 2008 WL 5413179
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that \[i]gnorance of the law is no defense.\
- bail bondsman’s mistaken belief that he had legal authority to detain citizens was no defense to criminal confinement charges
- where defendant blocked in victim’s van and argued that she could have left the scene without her van, meaning she was not confined without consent, defendant’s argument was merely a request to reweigh the evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vaidik, Riley, Darden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- William Hunter v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2016-07-21· cited 5×
- Tiplick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-01-27· cited 5×
- Christopher Tiplick v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-01-27
- Paul M. Camp v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-11-05
- Timothy E. Strowmatt v. Indiana Department of Correction (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-06-15
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Drane v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-05-29· cited 1,243×
- Marmont v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1874-11-15· cited 39×
- Mishler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-01-10· cited 24×
- Turner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court· 1875-05-15· cited 24×
- State v. TapiaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-04-16· cited 18×
- United States v. KeiverU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin· 1893-06-05· cited 16×
- Scalpelli v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-05-26· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.