Devost v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal statutes and regulations can form the basis of a breach of contract claim if expressly incorporated into the contract
• holding that “[f]ederal statutes and regulations can form the basis of a breach-of-contract claim if the parties expressly incorporate them into their contact”
• “[E]ven if they could premise their claim on RESPA, they cannot show any particular damages they suffered from Chase’s violation.”
• “[E]ven if they could premise their claim on RESPA, they cannot show any particular damages they suffered from Chase’s violation.”
• RESPA amendments did not bind Bank’s actions that occurred before effective date of amendment
• a plaintiff may not bring a claim for negligent misrepresentation unless he can show that he suffered an injury that is distinct, separate, and independent from the economic losses recoverable under a breach of contract claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).