Skip to main content
· 7/31/1998

DeVore v. Marshack (In Re DeVore)

Citations

  • 223 B.R. 193
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6405
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 8917
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1013
  • 1998 WL 493906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding property that was technically abandoned under § 554(c) was not brought back into estate by virtue of reopening the case
  • noting that some “courts have held that reopening a bankruptcy case puts the bankruptcy estate back into the process of administration and revives the original case”
  • finding that awarding fee from abandoned proceeds of state court judgment was improper
  • recognizing the \general rule that abandonment is irrevocable\
  • “Mailing a notice by first class mail to a party’s last known address is sufficient to satisfy due process.”
  • “Mailing a notice by first class mail to a party’s last known address is sufficient to satisfy due process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brandt, Hagan, Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.