Skip to main content
· 3/29/1991

Devore v. City of Mesa

Citations

  • 783 F. Supp. 452
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20264
  • 1991 WL 319092

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining under law of the case doctrine to revisit arguments rejected by transferring judge in earlier ruling
  • “Plaintiffs cannot obtain double recovery for the same injury; but that prospect can be addressed at a later stage of the case, if necessary.”
  • “To be sure, Plaintiffs cannot obtain double recovery for the same injury; but that prospect can be addressed at a later stage of the case, if necessary.”
  • weighing the use of a bank account as a contact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNamee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.