· 3/29/1991
Devore v. City of Mesa
Citations
- 783 F. Supp. 452
- 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20264
- 1991 WL 319092
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining under law of the case doctrine to revisit arguments rejected by transferring judge in earlier ruling
- “Plaintiffs cannot obtain double recovery for the same injury; but that prospect can be addressed at a later stage of the case, if necessary.”
- “To be sure, Plaintiffs cannot obtain double recovery for the same injury; but that prospect can be addressed at a later stage of the case, if necessary.”
- weighing the use of a bank account as a contact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McNamee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.