Devlin v. Sosbe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the trial court’s use of the term “victim” in its instruction to the jury was prejudicial error
• finding error when the issue of “whether sexual offenses occurred was a disputed fact for the jury to resolve”
• “The issue -6- of whether sexual offenses occurred and whether E.C. and J.C. were ‘victims’ were issues of fact for the jury to decide.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).