Devlin v. Piechoski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidentiary value of crucial document no less effective because it came into the case through the defendant rather than the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hrivnak v. Perrone
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-04-28· cited 43×
• Summit Fasteners, Inc. v. Harleysville National Bank & Trust Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-09-30· cited 28×
• Rodgers v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-02-23· cited 23×
• Williams v. A-Treat Bottling Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-12-12· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. 21.1 Acres of Land
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-08-20· cited 6×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Northern Trust Co. v. Huber
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-05-15· cited 39×
• Hess v. Vinton Colliery Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1916-07-01· cited 28×
• Devlin v. Piechoski
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-06-26· cited 19×
• Husvar v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-07-06· cited 7×