DeVlieg-Bullard, Inc. v. Natale (In Re DeVlieg, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that law firm had high degree of familiarity with the case and evidentiary materials and having to duplicate the attorneys' efforts with new counsel would be at a substantial expense to the estate
• noting that law firm had high degree of familiarity with the case and evidentiary materials and having to duplicate the attorneys’ efforts with new counsel would be at a substantial expense to the estate
• “[S]ection 327(e) does not require that counsel be a ‘disinterested person,’ as section 327(a) does . . . .”
• “[S]ection 327(e) . . . permit[s] counsel to have claims for prior fees.”
• explaining different adverse interest requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).