DeVivo v. Ascher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that nonparty recipient was significantly interested because the records sought in the litigation were relevant to the amount owed to the recipient and the recipient \could properly have been joined as a party\
• applying the privilege to an attorney's letter, alleged to contain libelous statements, written to counsel for a company not a party to the litigation
• reasoning that a statement is related “if it has any bearing upon the subject matter of the litigation” and is unrelated only if it is “so wanting in relation to the subject matter of the controversy as that no reasonable man can doubt its relevancy and impropriety”
• reasoning that a statement is related “if it has any bearing upon the subject matter of the litigation” and is unrelated only if it is “so wanting in relation to the subject matter of the controversy as that no reasonable man can doubt its irrelevancy and impropriety”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).