· 6/21/2022
Devion Faulkner v. the State of Texas
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that party may seek allocation of property omitted from decree either by separate civil action or by motion to reopen dissolution
- recognizing that party may seek allocation of property omitted from decree either by separate civil action or by motion to reopen dissolution
- presuming superior court found every fact necessary to support its ruling because parties did not request written findings of fact or conclusions of law
- presuming superior court found every fact necessary to support its ruling where parties did not request written findings of fact or conclusions of law
- Absent a request for written findings of fact and conclusions of law, “we presume that the superior court found every fact necessary to support its ruling.”
- “Because neither party requested written findings of fact or conclusions of law, we presume that the superior court found every fact necessary to support its ruling.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.