Skip to main content
· 6/21/2022

Devion Faulkner v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that party may seek allocation of property omitted from decree either by separate civil action or by motion to reopen dissolution
  • recognizing that party may seek allocation of property omitted from decree either by separate civil action or by motion to reopen dissolution
  • presuming superior court found every fact necessary to support its ruling because parties did not request written findings of fact or conclusions of law
  • presuming superior court found every fact necessary to support its ruling where parties did not request written findings of fact or conclusions of law
  • Absent a request for written findings of fact and conclusions of law, “we presume that the superior court found every fact necessary to support its ruling.”
  • “Because neither party requested written findings of fact or conclusions of law, we presume that the superior court found every fact necessary to support its ruling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.