Devine v. MHC Waterford Estates, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employer’s “accommodation of the other employees . . . does not undermine its position that [the] ability to work mandatory overtime is an essential function”
• holding that the defendant was entitled to rely on doctor’s letter as establishing an ongoing restriction because the letter “identified no ending date” for the plaintiff’s restriction and the defendant “never received any additional information from [plaintiff’s] physician”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).