Devin Tremaine v. Maddison Lery Reid and in the Interest of L. L. T., a Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that admissibility “may turn on phrasing subtleties in the prosecutor’s questions and the witness’s responses”
• holding that admissibility “may turn on phrasing subtleties in the prosecutor’s questions and the witness’s responses”
• holding that any error in admitting expert testimony was not plain in part because it “is a nuanced legal issue without clearly established bright line parameters, particularly in light of the discordant . . . divide of opinions in Williams”
• warning that expert testimony can be “little more than a backdoor conduit for an otherwise inadmissible statement”
• finding that an assumed Confrontation Clause violation did not affect a defendant's substantial rights where the defendant would have been convicted even without the erroneous testimony
• warning that expert testimony can be \little more than a backdoor conduit for an otherwise inadmissible statement\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).