Deville v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the trial court’s “no prejudice” determination under Brady, following appellant’s bench trial, was a factual finding
• explaining that the trial court’s “no prejudice” determination under Brady, following appellant’s bench trial, was a factual finding
• explaining that the trial court's \no prejudice\ determination under Brady, following appellant's bench trial, was a factual finding
• holding there was no prejudice -9- where the trial court found that earlier disclosure of exculpatory material would not have changed the outcome of the trial
• rejecting due process claim under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963
• when a factfinder tells us its basis for ruling, we “know with certitude” and “need not hypothesize”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).