Device Trading, Ltd. v. VIKING CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that contract damages “are not recoverable where they are remote, speculative, contingent, or not the result of the injury”
• reasonableness is a question of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kovacs v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1984-05-14· cited 30×
• Soloman v. Western Hills Development Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1981-10-07· cited 27×
• Cornforth v. Borman’s, Inc
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-01-22· cited 14×
• Johnson v. Patmon, Young & Kirk, PC
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-09-09· cited 3×
• Scher Enterprises, Inc. v. Bronco Wine Co.
  E.D. Michigan· 2001-12-11

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Froling v. Bischoff
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1977-02-02· cited 29×
• Macarthur Patton Christian Ass'n v. Farm Bureau Insurance Group
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 24×
• Miller v. Radikopf
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1975-05-05· cited 22×
• Fisk v. Powell
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1957-09-04· cited 15×
• Philips Industries, Inc v. Smith
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1979-05-21· cited 11×
• Reinardy v. Bruzzese
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1962-12-31· cited 10×
• Cacavas v. Zack
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1972-09-28· cited 6×
• Dundee Cement Co. v. Schupbach Bros., Inc.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1979-12-06· cited 6×
• Bank of Lansing v. Stein, Hinkle, Dawe & Associates Architects, Inc.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-10-22· cited 3×
• Curtis v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1953-01-05· cited 2×