Skip to main content
· 3/8/2011

Development Acquisition Group, LLC. v. Ea Consulting, Inc.

Citations

  • 776 F. Supp. 2d 1161
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23473
  • 2011 WL 837162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Rule 56 also allows a court to grant summary adjudication on part of a claim or defense.”
  • “Under 27 California's usury laws, DAG wrongfully chargded EA interest on the Note in excess of 10% per annum and, as such, is entitled only to the original principal of $500,000.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: England

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.