Deveaux v. Newyork

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that ALJ discussed claimant’s performance of activities of daily living but did not equate it with ability to work
• noting that an ALJ need not accept a doctor’s conclusory statement that the claimant is disabled or unable to work
• finding that substantial evidence supported the ALJ’s finding that a treating source 11 opinion “contradicts both the objective medical evidence and [the claimant’s] own account of his abilities”
• explaining that subjective complaints, followed by negative medical findings, do not substantiate limitation
• noting plaintiff's argument for further restrictions failed due to plaintiff's failure to identify medical evidence justifying further restrictions
• A claimant is not entitled to remand if he “does not identify medical evidence that would justify further restrictions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).