Skip to main content
· 12/13/2005

DeVaughn v. Inphonic, Inc.

Citations

  • 403 F. Supp. 2d 68
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32235
  • 2005 WL 3370829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that district court’s ruling denying motion to transfer “was effectively a ruling that [appellant] had failed to shoulder his burden”
  • noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) is the proper venue provision for an FMLA claim
  • noting that “the case has not progressed so far that delay would result if another court must familiarize itself with the disputed facts or the procedural background”
  • 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) is the proper venue provision for an FMLA claim
  • 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) is the proper venue provision for an FMLA claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.