Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the statute in question was not correctly applied to the undisputed facts.”
• stating that “[i]t is futile to expect statutory codes to be all-encompassing and to anticipate every eventuality”
• stating that statute of limitations on a note begins to run when the loan goes into default
• stating that statute of limitations on a note begins to run when the loan goes into default
• stating that a court should read a statute contextually in light of the common law
• determining legislative intent of ambiguous statute from similar statutes, relevant common law principles, and policy considerations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).