Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Deluca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Johnson Act was inapplicable where a plaintiff presented evidence and testimony that a rate order affected the cost of its goods in interstate commerce
• recognizing that the Act’s process requirement “had been interpreted as requiring that the minimum standards of due process be met.”
• holding that the Johnson Act was inapplicable where a plaintiff presented evidence and testimony that a rate order affected the cost of its goods in interstate commerce
• finding expert testimony on the meaning of terms of art admissible
• rejecting idea that compliance with state law is a safe harbor
• “It is well settled that the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing subject matter jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).