Skip to main content
· 7/16/2010

Deutsch v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Citations

  • 723 F. Supp. 2d 521
  • 2010 WL 2803038

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that for a punitive damages conflict-of-laws issue, “the law of the jurisdiction where the conduct occurred should apply”
  • reasoning a pharmaceutical company made decisions at its New Jersey headquarters to conduct inadequate clinical trials, conceal information from regulators, and increase a drug’s dosage and dosing schedule to excessive levels
  • reasoning a pharmaceutical company made decisions at its New Jersey headquarters to conduct inadequate clinical trials, conceal information from regulators, and increase a drug’s dosage and dosing schedule to excessive levels
  • reasoning a pharmaceutical company made decisions at its New Jersey headquarters to conduct inadequate clinical trials, conceal information from regulators, and increase a drug’s dosage and dosing schedule to excessive levels
  • reasoning a pharmaceutical company made decisions at its New Jersey headquarters to conduct inadequate clinical trials, conceal information from regulators, and increase a drug’s dosage and dosing schedule to excessive levels
  • reasoning a pharmaceutical company made decisions at its New Jersey headquarters to conduct inadequate clinical trials, conceal information from regulators, and increase a drug’s dosage and dosing schedule to excessive levels

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.