Deutsch Ex Rel. Estate of Deutsch v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that objections to the factual bases for the experts’ opinions on the incidence rate “go to the weight and not the admissibility of their testimony”
• explaining that “[t]he weight of a conclusion derived” from an observational study “involves the resolution of a factual dispute . . . for the jury”
• explaining that expert witness was permitted to “opine on his interpretation of whether certain information contained in [defendant’s] internal documents indicated certain risks”
• allowing doctors to testify where they based their opinions on their own experiences and review of literature
• allowing opinion testimony that the incidence rate of ONJ was generally five percent or above
• allowing a rebuttal expert to critique the reliability of an opposing expert’s opinion based upon the rebuttal expert’s experience

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).