Skip to main content
· 10/7/1957

Deutsch ex rel. Deutsch v. Aaron & Lillie Straus Foundation, Inc.

Citations

  • 155 F. Supp. 551
  • 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a surreply might be appropriate “when a moving party ‘sandbags’ an adversary by raising new arguments in a reply brief’
  • denying a motion to compel the deposition of defendant employees after plaintiff unilaterally noticed depositions with 10 business days’ notice just over 2 weeks before the discovery cutoff
  • ten business days deposition notice unreasonable in complex litigation
  • diseussing reasonable notice for depositions under Rule 30(b)(6)
  • finding ten business days insufficient notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.