· 7/6/2000
Dettmann v. Kruckenberg
Citations
- 613 N.W.2d 238
- 2000 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 127
- 2000 WL 895143
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing and applying “incentive to litigate” requirement to affirm civil judgment giving preclusive effect to criminal conviction establishing identity of driver in fatal accident
- discussing and applying “incentive to litigate” requirement to affirm civil judgment giving preclusive effect to criminal conviction establishing identity of driver in fatal accident
- discussing and applying “incentive to litigate” requirement to affirm civil judgment giving preclusive effect to criminal conviction establishing identity of driver in fatal accident
- privity requires the party to have had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the first proceeding
- privity requires the party to have had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the first proceeding
- issue preclusion not pled; defendant filed supplemental answer to interrogatory suggesting person other than defendant was driving car; issue preclusion applied based on earlier criminal conviction of defendant as driver
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGiverin, Neuman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.