Skip to main content
· 7/6/2000

Dettmann v. Kruckenberg

Citations

  • 613 N.W.2d 238
  • 2000 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 127
  • 2000 WL 895143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing and applying “incentive to litigate” requirement to affirm civil judgment giving preclusive effect to criminal conviction establishing identity of driver in fatal accident
  • discussing and applying “incentive to litigate” requirement to affirm civil judgment giving preclusive effect to criminal conviction establishing identity of driver in fatal accident
  • discussing and applying “incentive to litigate” requirement to affirm civil judgment giving preclusive effect to criminal conviction establishing identity of driver in fatal accident
  • privity requires the party to have had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the first proceeding
  • privity requires the party to have had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the first proceeding
  • issue preclusion not pled; defendant filed supplemental answer to interrogatory suggesting person other than defendant was driving car; issue preclusion applied based on earlier criminal conviction of defendant as driver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Neuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.