Detroit Trust Co. v. Schantz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, because of earlier delays, court did not abuse discretion in denying one‐day extension after lawyer’s computer allegedly broke down
• affirming trial court’s decision to deny motion for one-day extension in filing evidentiary materials, strike untimely- filed materials, and grant summary judgment on basis of properly filed record
• “A good judge sets deadlines, and the judge has a right to assume that deadlines will be honored.”
• “If the court allows litigants to continually ignore deadlines and seek never ending extensions without consequence, 7 soon the court's scheduling orders would become meaningless.”
• district court did not abuse discretion in rejecting counsel’s “catastrophic computer failure” as justification for one-day extension to file supporting materials in support of response to motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).