Skip to main content
· 3/6/2018

Detroit International Bridge v. Government of Canada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing the Tax Court for \failing to adhere to the unambiguous language contained in the statutes in question\
  • reversing the Tax Court for “failing to adhere to the unambiguous language contained in the statutes in question”
  • reversing the Tax Court for “failing to adhere to the unambiguous language contained in the statutes in question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.