Dethlefsen v. Stull

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the 13 appellant’s letter suggesting the respondent to be “an undesirable partner because he was 14 dishonest in his financial dealings with his copartner” was sufficient to state a cause of 15 action for libel against the appellant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).