Deters v. Ky. Bar Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under the categorical approach, Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence
• holding that, under the categorical approach, Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence
• holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Mathis, does not undermine the holding of Anglin that Hobbs Act robbery constitutes a crime of violence under the force clause of § 924(c)(3)
• recognizing the recent holding that Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under the elements clause
• rejecting argument that Hobbs Act robbery is not a crime of violence
• “Because one cannot commit Hobbs Act robbery without using or threatening physical force, … Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a predicate for a crime‐of‐violence conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).